3 ms·
Indeed, that is way smaller than planks length: https://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=is+2^-160+smaller+than+1.6+%C3%9710^%E2%88%9235 https://www.wolframalpha.c
by TrainedMonkey 13y ago
Indeed, that is way smaller than planks length: https://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=is+2^-160+smaller+than+1.6+%C3%9710^%E2%88%9235 https://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=is+2^-160+smaller+than...
- roywiggins 13y agoYou can't compare 2^-160 with a number with a unit attached- it's meaningless. 2^-160 meters is smaller than the planck length, but 2^-160 isn't. If your unit is "the volume of the observable universe" you get a pretty large volume (on a human scale, anyway): https://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=%282^-160%29+*+%28the+volume+of+the+observable+universe%29+ https://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=%282^-160%29+*+%28the+... edit: oh, the units came from the grand-parent post to yours, but wouldn't the correct conversion be "2^-160 earth's surface-areas"? That's actually bigger than the planck area- but still stupid small. https://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=%28The+surface+area+of+the+earth+%2F+%282^160%29%29+%2F+planck+area https://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=%28The+surface+area+of...
- TrainedMonkey 13y agoGood catch, I just mentally assigned meter unit to 2^-160.