What is inconsistent is that I consider some receipts spamº. As a matter of fact I consider A LOT of transactional mail spam. And under the test of "would I w

What is inconsistent is that I consider some receipts spamº. As a matter of fact I consider A LOT of transactional mail spam. And under the test of "would I want to get a similar email" from all the companies I do business with, I’d have to say I want no mail at all. But that’s not the truth - I want emails that are helpful, and not emails that are pointless. What’s helpful and pointless varies from recipient to recipient - but it also varies from company to company - some mails that are appropriate for other companies are not for yours. And vis versa. A blanket rule that if one kind of mail is unacceptable if everyone sends is unacceptable for anyone to send really isn’t true. There needs to be a middle ground. I think my rule is fine - if the person using the test is close enough to me in what they want. Perhaps your rule is fine, if the person is closer to you. This is probably why this is so hard - we can’t even formulate a rule that people of good faith can follow to build an acceptable policy. º Spam receipts I my company gets include every mail from AT&T, Zendesk, and Safari Books where we're just paying the standard monthly charge. Overages - those I’d like to know about but of course we don’t get those kinds of useful emails - we get those when do the books.