3 ms·

> No SR71 (or anything that can be seen as a replacement) The SR-72 would be a pretty impressive effort, if realised. http://www.lockheedmartin.com/us/news/fe

• mschuster91 13y ago
  Too bad that thing is unmanned. For sure, it massively reduces the complexity (no life support, no need for high-temperature-stable glass, more agility in flight due to much higher g-force tolerances)... but just imagine flying it!