3 ms·

>But the guy in the article wants to be a High School teacher. I already mentioned low-paid jobs. Also, at least here in Australia the only pure degrees that

>But the guy in the article wants to be a High School teacher. I already mentioned low-paid jobs. Also, at least here in Australia the only pure degrees that the high-school education system cares about are maths and science, everything else is "generalist" and can be filled by any teacher. In addition, at least here a general degree isn't good enough any more, you either need a teaching degree or a graduate diploma in teaching.

jrs99 13y ago
i wouldn't call a high school teacher a low paying job. i guess it is compared to software. In the US at least, it sounds very reasonable to go to college to get a history degree if your goal is to become a high school history teacher. To me, it sounds perfectly an achievable goal to decide to go to college, get a major in history, know that you're not even close to the best historians out there, and expect a job teaching high school. just like the guy in the article assumed. Unfortunately, it didn't work out, and might have been a waste of money. But there was nothing unreasonable in his thought process, from my perspective at least. I would even bet it won't be too tough for him to get a teaching job in the future.
- Perdition 13y ago
  >expect a job teaching high school. Yeah see the expectation is the problem. Here in Australia most of the people with teaching degrees are waiting for the boomers to retire, because there are very few full time positions (unless you are willing to move to the most remote and poor communities). >But there was nothing unreasonable in his thought process, from my perspective at least. The unreasonable thing is believing that just getting a degree will get you into a middle-class profession. That hasn't been true for at least twenty years. You need good grades, co-ops, and connections. As the article points out the market for tertiary educated workers is smaller than the pool of tertiary educated workers.
  - jrs99 13y ago
    I agree. But what can you do? You're a student and want to be a high school history teacher. You might not have what it takes to be a PhD Historian. You might not get a teaching job. Still probably want to get a degree.

jrs99 13y ago

i wouldn't call a high school teacher a low paying job. i guess it is compared to software. In the US at least, it sounds very reasonable to go to college to get a history degree if your goal is to become a high school history teacher. To me, it sounds perfectly an achievable goal to decide to go to college, get a major in history, know that you're not even close to the best historians out there, and expect a job teaching high school. just like the guy in the article assumed. Unfortunately, it didn't work out, and might have been a waste of money. But there was nothing unreasonable in his thought process, from my perspective at least. I would even bet it won't be too tough for him to get a teaching job in the future.

Perdition 13y ago
>expect a job teaching high school. Yeah see the expectation is the problem. Here in Australia most of the people with teaching degrees are waiting for the boomers to retire, because there are very few full time positions (unless you are willing to move to the most remote and poor communities). >But there was nothing unreasonable in his thought process, from my perspective at least. The unreasonable thing is believing that just getting a degree will get you into a middle-class profession. That hasn't been true for at least twenty years. You need good grades, co-ops, and connections. As the article points out the market for tertiary educated workers is smaller than the pool of tertiary educated workers.
- jrs99 13y ago
  I agree. But what can you do? You're a student and want to be a high school history teacher. You might not have what it takes to be a PhD Historian. You might not get a teaching job. Still probably want to get a degree.