3 ms·
Except that it doesn't seem to be original work. So how are you going to maintain that your derivative work was fair use, which relies on being non-commercial,
by supersystem 13y ago
Except that it doesn't seem to be original work. So how are you going to maintain that your derivative work was fair use, which relies on being non-commercial, while suing someone for damages? Especially when the one who "stole" your work seems to have a better case for fair use.
- leephillips 13y ago"it doesn't seem to be original work" You mean it's a depiction of an existing character from a game or something. That doesn't mean that it's not original artwork. I'm sure that would be a relevant issue in court, but that's why we have trials. "which relies on being non-commercial" As other posters here have pointed out, this is not true.
- chrismcb 13y agoHer derivative work is not fair use. So she doesn't need to argue that. And the other person has NO case of fair use.