1. I haven't proposed any solution. I'm defending the existence of regulators. And I never said regulation was perfect. Just that we need some. 2. Asking "Who

1. I haven't proposed any solution. I'm defending the existence of regulators. And I never said regulation was perfect. Just that we need some. 2. Asking "Who will regulate the regulators" is unproductive. Obviously, human nature wont change, and corruption will always exist. But just because regulation isn't perfect doesn't mean we should throw it out. Also, you should already know the answer to your own question. By promoting transparency, citizen participation, and establishing checks and balances, we can mitigate the effects of corruption (but not entirely). This has been known for, I dunno, a few hundred years. Are we really debating this now?