14 ms·
There seems to be a major issue with artists having their work appropriated and stolen. I wonder if there isn't a startup business model in here somewhere. An
by jxf 13y ago
There seems to be a major issue with artists having their work appropriated and stolen.
I wonder if there isn't a startup business model in here somewhere. An artist could sign up for a service that automatically does TinEye or a Google reverse image search for images that they upload, and then flags suspicious uses for the artist to review.
If it's fair use then you can whitelist a particular site. Maybe the software could even do it for you, by learning about the reputation of various sites for this particular activity and automatically assigning risk factors and so on.
Right now, it seems like the only way to catch art thieves is to have the coincidence of someone who's familiar with both your work and the thief's work point it out to you.
- normloman 13y agoArtists know how to use tin eye already. But automating the process for batches would be useful. Now here's the question: How many people would pay for this service? Artists ain't exactly rich.
- TophWells 13y agoHow does Tineye make money at the moment? I'm sure there's a business model somewhere that would work.
- normloman 13y agoHere's how they make money: https://services.tineye.com/MulticolorEngine#plans-and-pricing https://services.tineye.com/MulticolorEngine#plans-and-prici...
- panarky 13y agoArtists wouldn't have to pay upfront. They could sign up for free, register their art, then the service could participate in royalties on a contingent basis.