4 ms·
I'm going through their FP in Scala book right now. So I'm focusing on pure Scala for the moment. But I'll be definitely learning enough Haskell to be able to
by joostdevries 13y ago
I'm going through their FP in Scala book right now. So I'm focusing on pure Scala for the moment.
But I'll be definitely learning enough Haskell to be able to read papers and such. Since most of the literature on how to do FP come with examples in Haskell.
- JimmyM 13y agoThe nice thing about FP is that you can basically copy-paste algorithms direct from academic texts, tweaking only very slightly for syntax. It's this way in Racket, I imagine it's even more easy in Haskell!
- pdpi 13y agoLast time I touched Racket it was still called mzScheme. Good times.
- joostdevries 13y agoThat's true. But it's my impression that the terminology used in Haskell in discussing types of functions is different enough to require some study. A Haskell to Scala translation of terminology would be what I'd have to devise for myself.