Yeah. But is this a conversation about "if you want to participate in system X, follow rules Y" or specifically anti-government sentiment? As the Wired articl

Yeah. But is this a conversation about "if you want to participate in system X, follow rules Y" or specifically anti-government sentiment? As the Wired article talks about the cost of coming into compliance, I think it is reasonable for the parent poster to ignore the source of the rules. Unless you wanted to make a point about the source of rules impacting compliance costs or voice your other reason for such a government/private distinction. But now that I've already started arguing with myself I'm not going to go any further.