4 ms·
First, it’s cheap. Second, it's integrated. Which, to me at least, feels much more natural than AWS where you rent a virtual server, and then a database separa
by spindritf 13y ago
First, it’s cheap.
Second, it's integrated. Which, to me at least, feels much more natural than AWS where you rent a virtual server, and then a database separately, persistent storage separately... Because it's integrated, it's also simple.
And they have a datacentre* in Amsterdam. Even two of them, right in the heart of the European Internet. That means latency to their servers is not noticeable in much of the EU.
* Yes, yes, probably more like a cage or whatever they rent.
- Kudos 13y agoWhat is integrated about it? They're just a VPS provider, which is a strict subset of what you can do on AWS.
- ddorian43 13y agorestart your aws server = goodbye data or hello network hdd
- dave_sullivan 13y agoThat's true in the same way that double taxation is a concern when setting up a corporation. It kind of is, but it's really not. Due to downvotes, I guess I better explain what I mean: Basically, EC2 provides instances where "if you restart your server you lose your data". You don't use those when that would be a problem for you, you use EBS backed instances which do not have this problem. Or you do it some other way. Point being, this is technically true but it's not really a problem in practice. The double taxation reference refers to it being a somewhat common misconception among people that have taken a business class before that US corporations are "double taxed". IE, corporate profits are taxed, then your personal income is taxed. This is technically true but does not actually matter because you pay yourself a salary (which is taxed as income), but this is deducted as an expense from corporate income (thus not double taxed). Point being--it's the same FUD.
- ddorian43 13y agowhat about the none-bytes-free bandwidth ?
- jcampbell1 13y agoI don't get the analogy. With EC2 you either lose your data when rebooting, or you have to use network storage (iSCSI) which has advantages and disadvantages. BTW, when I invest in a corporation, I do get double taxed. The profits are taxed at the highest possible income tax rate, then I pay 15% tax on the distribution of profits. Of course if I work for that corporation, I opt to take the "profits" as a bonus. I pay all the taxes in that case, but at least there isn't double taxation.
- bmelton 13y agoBut there are a myriad of scenarios where booting to a AWS image, effectively a CD, is preferred. Having a non-writable filesystem is cool, where that non-writability allows for the saving of temp files and such, but if it were ever compromised, I would just reboot it, and it's exactly how it used to be. Even smarter, I would boot up another clean instance and take that one down, then remap the elastic IP to cut over. For data that must be stored, I can use a EBS, or a database instance. Like the grand-parent said, you pick what makes sense. Saying that ephemeral storage is a bad thing would be true if that were all they offered, but it isn't, and it ephemeral images are sometimes preferred.
- singingcheese 13y agoA reboot doesn't cause you to lose data on your ephemeral storage. I think you mean "stopping" an instance and then "starting" it again (on another host), not rebooting it.
- bmelton 13y agoYou are correct, that is what I meant, but I've taken to calling it 'rebooting' because all the intro-to-EC2 stuff I've seen listed their "how to reboot the instance" instructions as stopping and starting it, so I figured it's the appropriate vernacular, however incorrect it might otherwise be.
- hiphopyo 13y agoCorrect me if I'm wrong, but aren't they a cloud provider? Ie. a bunch of machines connected into a distributed network, acting like a single virtual machine but with unlimited speed, memory and bandwidth, with the possibility of downtime completely eliminated, and where one only has to pay for the speed, memory and bandwidth one uses.
- deleted 13y ago[deleted]
- jcampbell1 13y agoEverything you wrote is wrong. Not sure what to correct. They are a VPS. They do bill hourly, which makes them somewhat unique. They were early to offer SSDs. Their pricing is great. I don't want the "cloud". I want a really good VPS. Digital Ocean fits that bill.
- vertex-four 13y agoAside from Google App Engine, no cloud services provider, whether IaaS or PaaS, gets even close to the description you're providing, and even GAE doesn't really.