If you dive into the exchange following http://www.openldap.org/lists/openldap-devel/200802/msg00100.html http://www.openldap.org/lists/openldap-devel/200802/ms

If you dive into the exchange following http://www.openldap.org/lists/openldap-devel/200802/msg00100.html http://www.openldap.org/lists/openldap-devel/200802/msg00100... you'll see that the criticism does not only allude to the liberal use of strcat() and strcopy() but has more fundamental problems about the general quality and efficiency of the code. While I do agree that digging up a 5 year old rant with a catchy tagline does not tell us everything about the projects current state, the rebuttal also misses some of the points brought up in the initial criticism