3 ms·
We're using it in a responsive website that renders on tablets...not quite mobile, and not delivered via a packaged web-view app. It performs fine for 99% t of
by taude 13y ago
We're using it in a responsive website that renders on tablets...not quite mobile, and not delivered via a packaged web-view app. It performs fine for 99% t of our use cases on more modern tablets. Most JavaScript apps suck on < iPad 2 vintage tablets anyway. I wouldn't go rendering a 1000 templates client-side with it. (We have one list that renders a complex template 100x) and it takes about 3500 ms for the knockout rendering of it. This template has maybe 20 conditionals in it or so.
- basicallydan 13y agoThat's good to hear. Thanks very much for your thoughts :)