3 ms·
Hm. I wonder if this question poses more harm than good, but I'll ask it: Does the right to free speech protect in this way: <a href="[not_protected]">[pr
by thenerdfiles 13y ago
Hm. I wonder if this question poses more harm than good, but I'll ask it:
Does the right to free speech protect in this way:
<a href="[not_protected]">[protected]</a>
?
- thenerdfiles 13y agoI ask because it seems that we're moving in the direction of <a href="[not_protected]">[not_protected]</a> That said: blah blah blah .... blah blah Now if a crawler scans that, puts it into an aggregate feed and cites me as the source, and there's a hyperlink in there... That means trouble for everyone. But really, if I give you some text and you copy-paste a substring of it into a search engine and get a Stratfor document, what's that mean? Is it the function of a hyperlink + intent, or is it just the speech itself? Doesn't "speech" imply intentionality which itself is what is examined by law?