3 ms·
I think this is unnecessarily pessimistic. You know what validity checks the code performs. To catch this bug it would only have been necessary to make each o
by ScottBurson 13y ago
I think this is unnecessarily pessimistic. You know what validity checks the code performs. To catch this bug it would only have been necessary to make each of them fail and make sure the failure led to rejection.
It's true, that doesn't prove the implementation is perfect, which seems to be what you're holding up as the goal. But it would have caught this bug.