> Yes, but if you continue reading the start of the very next paragraph addresses this. "The trial was far too small to be conclusive ..." Yes, and it's somewh

> Yes, but if you continue reading the start of the very next paragraph addresses this. "The trial was far too small to be conclusive ..." Yes, and it's somewhat discouraging to see how rarely these appropriate caveats never get into either the headlines or the mind of the public. >“It’s a proof of concept,” Dr. Doblin said. >“It shows that this kind of trial can be done safely, and >that it’s very much worth doing.” That exactly what has not been demonstrated. A 20% change is not statistically significant in a test group of this size even if there had been a control group, and the placebo effect has not been controlled for. That's why I posted as I did -- it's junk science. Again, LSD might be a breakthrough in therapy, unfortunately this study doesn't contribute to our scientific understanding.