3 ms·
Is this in jest, or should we take it seriously? I mean the generalized version of this, of course: are there any astronomical phenomena we currently see as nat
by wlievens 17y ago
Is this in jest, or should we take it seriously? I mean the generalized version of this, of course: are there any astronomical phenomena we currently see as natural that could in fact plausibly artifacts of artificial processes?
- stavrianos 17y agowe've had terrific success explaining the things we see in the sky with simple, "dead" processes. I think that gamma bursts specifically haven't been explained though?