I actually disagree. (And I disagree with Churchill.) Let's assume that we agree that liberalism is a good thing. We can hash out what "liberalism" actually me

I actually disagree. (And I disagree with Churchill.) Let's assume that we agree that liberalism is a good thing. We can hash out what "liberalism" actually means, if you like. I'm willing to be flexible on the definition. Given that assumption, let's sketch out a governmental form and argue about feasibility. I suspect that, unless we go very far afield from mainstream concepts of liberalism, we'll arrive at something approximating democracy very closely, differing mostly in that it'll be overly idealistic. Anyone up for playing this game?