4 ms·
"Democracy is worst form of government except for all the others" - Churchill. I think one of the issues with modern democracy is the fact that it is rooted in
by TrainedMonkey 13y ago
"Democracy is worst form of government except for all the others" - Churchill.
I think one of the issues with modern democracy is the fact that it is rooted in the American past. Founding fathers set up an amazing system for 18th century. After globalization and rise of political advertising in mass media... well not so much. As a matter of fact politicians spend close to majority of their time just raising money [0][1]. Is it really a wonder Congress can't get anything done? Is it really a surprise that people who end up staying in politics for a long time are people who 'worked out' an understanding with special interests. System is setup to attract people who have friends which stand to gain from access to political power.
I think current political system of United States is flawed and we are leading other democracies by example, while making suboptimal decisions.
Interestingly enough I believe founding fathers foreseen this and provided us with an out - amendments. However with current gridlock it would be almost impossible to do anything about it without overwhelming popular support. Said gridlock also greatly benefits anyone who has enough spending money to 'help' politicians out with their campaigns.
So here is potential solution (I thought it up myself in relatively short amount of time, so there are probably issues with it):
1. Ban all monetary donations to politicians. All of them, no more advertisements.
2. Set up crowd sourced infrastructure to keep track of what politicians claim they would do and what they actually do. Kind of like wikipedia of politics.
3. Set up a public TV channel for debates and require all the major carriers to have it, live stream said channel on internet. Goal of this is to basically kill all political advertising elsewhere. On that channel televise debates on most up voted questions on infrastructure set up. Require candidates to provide clear answers and keep track of the answers on said infrastructure, so that people can view key issues and see how candidates responded to them.
There are a range of technological, societal, and organizational issues to accomplish something like this. It is easy to get wrong, and very hard to get right, so I am not sure if it would be worth trying in the first place.
0 - listen to the first three minutes to realize just how bad it is: http://www.thisamericanlife.org/radio-archives/episode/461/take-the-money-and-run-for-office http://www.thisamericanlife.org/radio-archives/episode/461/t... .
1 - or here is a shorter text version: http://www.npr.org/blogs/money/2012/03/26/149390968/take-the-money-and-run-for-office http://www.npr.org/blogs/money/2012/03/26/149390968/take-the...
- jeffbr13 13y agoIsn't that scheme similar to the one Aaron Swartz proposed, and Lawrence Lessig is campaigning for? EDIT: I think it was called [Change Congress](http://change-congress.org/ http://change-congress.org/), but that URL now redirects to [Rootstrikers](http://www.rootstrikers.org/ http://www.rootstrikers.org/).
- TrainedMonkey 13y agoI shamefully admit that I did not do any research, this is just an idea that popped in my head after listening to the radio show linked in [0]. If somebody already doing this, it would be pretty awesome.
- csense 13y agoHN discussion of video of Lessig / Swartz analysis of the problem with government: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7314740 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7314740
- shrughes 13y agoYeah, I think there's a better way to alter democracy than outlawing political speech for everybody except approved major parties. > Require candidates to provide clear answers And the enforcement mechanism is...?
- deleted 13y ago[deleted]
- dkuntz2 13y agoIs it really outlawing all political speech, or limiting the amount of influence the wealthy have over the body politic? Political speech would still be permitted, politics would just cease to be the playground of who can wield money better to who has the better ideas.
- dalek_cannes 13y agoAnd that is what has gone wrong with democracy -- the ability to buy power with money. So long as that is possible, democracy will always have a half-life.