3 ms·
Not sure about if that will work. Most of the time you can't change a thing in protocols if you want to have a minimal level of acceptance. You would only nee
by cfontes 13y ago
Not sure about if that will work.
Most of the time you can't change a thing in protocols if you want to have a minimal level of acceptance.
You would only need such a thing if you are developing a new protocol for something, which might happen a lot but I am not sure if it would be nice to be sharing not ready protocols on the web. Even if it would, people would still need to agree on a single one or something. Otherwise you will end up with 200000x DNA extraction protocols with their tiny customizations(Every lab technician has it's own way of doing every single step in some protocols...)
It would probably be nice as a in house access only system for universities and research facilities thought.
- pallandt 13y agoThere's already Springer Protocols (http://www.springerprotocols.com/ http://www.springerprotocols.com/), not free, but IMHO, universities and research facilities already have it better than whatever free alternative may come up in the future. This is not the sort of project that requires only upfront costs, this is why I unfortunately don't think it will live for long, if it ever gets completely funded.
- newyorklenny 13y agoThe changes, via a good user interface, will be visualized on step level. Very true that the UI is key here. But trust us - there will not be thousands of variants of a single protocol. There will be thousands of annotations, easily found for your species, on the single original published protocol.