3 ms·
True, but that's not necessarily the case in biology, where the people are no cheaper, but the experiments are a lot more expensive. Assuming $N of grant is as
by rflrob 13y ago
True, but that's not necessarily the case in biology, where the people are no cheaper, but the experiments are a lot more expensive. Assuming $N of grant is as easy to get in CS as biology (ha!), you'll be able to fund way more people in CS.
- Fomite 13y agoAgreed (I'm not a C.S. person, I'm a computational epidemiologist). This was mostly addressing the notion that because you don't need the LHC, or banks of PCR machines, or to enroll a couple thousand patients, that C.S. is somehow cheap, has zero costs, and zero pressure to get grant money. Postdocs, and computing time, and grad students, and your salary are all things that need to be supported by grant money. It might be easier, but to assert it's easy is flawed.
- p1esk 13y agoI'm curious, what is the job market for computational epidemiologists? The reason I'm asking is my gf is doing her PhD in that area, and I don't think her job prospects are very clear.