`Fraud` seems like exaggeration to the point of falsehood here. I'm not in the retail business but I was under the impression that there was nothing improper ab

`Fraud` seems like exaggeration to the point of falsehood here. I'm not in the retail business but I was under the impression that there was nothing improper about restocking and reselling non-defective returned-as-new goods. For anything less personal than a hamburger I'm not offended by the idea that another customer briefly touched the product I bought so long as it's physically clean and in 100% new condition. It was clearly an error to fail to wipe the system but it's just as clear that this was a routine oversight (on both customer A and the vendor's part), not malice.