4 ms·

> I really like this. In general, a well-supported non-crappy schema language for modern data exchange formats is long overdue (e.g. JSON Schema is horribly un-

by nevi-me 13y ago

> I really like this. In general, a well-supported non-crappy schema language for modern data exchange formats is long overdue (e.g. JSON Schema is horribly un-human-friendly). I think I'm a bit confused, is Q the actual schema or a validator of the schema? I can also validate a JSON document using JavaScript and respond with a true or false based on whether it meets certain criteria. So I think that there's something amiss with your statement above, specifically that "JSON Schema is horribly un-human-friendly". Doesn't Q take JSON and let the user know if it's correct or incorrect? WOuldn't JavaScript, or any other language at that, do the same?

rpedela 13y ago
JSON Schema refers to http://json-schema.org/ http://json-schema.org/ I don't personally understand what is so "un-human-friendly" about it. It is easy to use and understand in my opinion.
- nevi-me 13y ago
  I know what JSON is :)
  - bjeanes 13y ago
    JSON Schema != JSON.