5 ms·
And protected by the First Amendment. Unlike some theocratic regimes where the maker of this film would be beheaded, at least we have some remaining freedom of
by theorique 13y ago
And protected by the First Amendment.
Unlike some theocratic regimes where the maker of this film would be beheaded, at least we have some remaining freedom of speech and expression.
The right of free speech is not resolved in motherhood-and-apple-pie cases but in the extreme fringes of bad taste and offensiveness (Human Centipede, Nazi propaganda, etc)
- eropple 13y agoThis is a contract law case.
- baldfat 13y agoI disagree this is a first amendment case that someone found a way to get the video taken down. They then made this a copyright case due to a bad contract.
- btilly 13y agoYou can disagree, but you are wrong. A first amendment case, by definition, is a case involving whether the government has a right to restrict your speech. By contrast this case is about a person's private lawsuit to have unauthorized video of herself taken down. No government, no first amendment.