4 ms·

Then read the three links pointing above?

• turnip1979 13y ago
  All I see are a few perf graphs that show a 20% runtime reduction in a few cases and > 50% reduction in one case. This gives me no insight whatsoever what is going on under the hood. Is it that for these dozen or so benchmarks, we end up using > 4K and < 8K of heap? So the extra 20% time is just going into a memory allocation? P.S. Interesting that I got two snarky comments asking for a basic question about Go. Does not bode well.
  • voidlogic 13y ago
    >Is it that for these dozen or so benchmarks, we end up using > 4K and < 8K of heap? stack, not heap. We are talking about changing the default stack size. >So the extra 20% time is just going into a memory allocation? Yes and the book keeping overhead involved at the OS and runtime levels.