5 ms·
No need to inform us that you are not a lawyer. That was made quite clear when you gave us your take on the decision after reading the brief, never even mention
by dfc 13y ago
No need to inform us that you are not a lawyer. That was made quite clear when you gave us your take on the decision after reading the brief, never even mentioned first amendment concerns (good or bad) and failed to limit the scope of the precedent variable to the Ninth Circuit.
- shalmanese 13y agoI'd love to be educated. This seems to be primarily an IP case. What are the first amendment concerns?
- icebraining 13y agoI'm not a lawyer either, but from having read a few cases in the past, it seems that preliminary injunctions - like the one issued to force Google to take the film down - that prevent speech are usually considered violations of the First Amendment except in extreme cases. Whether this applies to copyright cases is still unclear, but it seems the Supreme Court has taken that stance: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1802778 http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1802778
- 1stop 13y agoWhy so rude? A person tries to contribute and your shoot them down, because they aren't an expert!? Were you not hugged enough as child?