4 ms·

3D Scanner Recreates Real-Life Objects on the Computer Screen

9 points by kkleiner 17y ago

noonespecial 17y ago
I wonder what ugly intellectual property issues will be dredged up when I can just copy, xerox-style, any small physical object I can stick in front of my $3000 scanner. The end of scarcity in the physical world will make the upheaval the entertainment industry faced at the hands of the internet seem like an argument at a PTA meeting.
- smhinsey 17y ago
  It seems like it is a bit of a leap from this to anything with an internal mechanism, which you'd have to disassemble and scan piecemeal, as far as I can tell. That said, one step closer to the matter replicator, which is great news to me.
  - noonespecial 17y ago
    Watch the "Jays Garage" video on the page where they print a working crescent wrench and an even more amazing working model of a steam engine, no assembly required. Its closer than you think.
    - smhinsey 17y ago
      Thanks for pointing that out, it's definitely interesting and I have the bad habit of tending to skip videos. What I meant by having to do it piecemeal was the scanning though, not the printing. I suppose in a world where you could simply download the whole CAD plan for whatever you want that doesn't matter much.
anigbrowl 17y ago
I am enthused. For a turnkey package $3k is very competitive - if I had the cash etc. etc. I'm not sure what I think of their 'HD pro' option - spend another $995 and get 2x speed and 4x resolution! such crippleware is begging to be hacked. Also cant' tell how their $995 CAD offering (NURBS and other 3d goodness) stacks up against the internal performance of other 3d packages. Anyhoo... One reason I like this is that I've always loved film special effects, but have been disappointed by the recent trend towards CG-everything. I personally do not enjoy 3d modeling at all. But with this, we might see a resurgence of the (nearly) lost art of miniature building for film and video and now gaming. In general I think it's way faster to sculpt from real materials and scan the result than to do the same thing in a modeling package for all but the simplest items. For hacker purists, here's a page about going DIY... http://www.chromecow.com/MadScience/3DScanner/3DScan.htm http://www.chromecow.com/MadScience/3DScanner/3DScan.htm
gfodor 17y ago
This has actually been out a while now, pretty awesome tech. I interviewed at NextEngine a few years ago, and they wouldn't tell me what they were working on -- I had to guess based upon their interview questions (about 3d matrix transformations, etc) -- I did manage to come close and guess it was a 3d scanner in box!

9 points by kkleiner 17y ago

I wonder what ugly intellectual property issues will be dredged up when I can just copy, xerox-style, any small physical object I can stick in front of my $3000 scanner. The end of scarcity in the physical world will make the upheaval the entertainment industry faced at the hands of the internet seem like an argument at a PTA meeting.

smhinsey 17y ago
It seems like it is a bit of a leap from this to anything with an internal mechanism, which you'd have to disassemble and scan piecemeal, as far as I can tell. That said, one step closer to the matter replicator, which is great news to me.
- noonespecial 17y ago
  Watch the "Jays Garage" video on the page where they print a working crescent wrench and an even more amazing working model of a steam engine, no assembly required. Its closer than you think.
  - smhinsey 17y ago
    Thanks for pointing that out, it's definitely interesting and I have the bad habit of tending to skip videos. What I meant by having to do it piecemeal was the scanning though, not the printing. I suppose in a world where you could simply download the whole CAD plan for whatever you want that doesn't matter much.

anigbrowl 17y ago

I am enthused. For a turnkey package $3k is very competitive - if I had the cash etc. etc. I'm not sure what I think of their 'HD pro' option - spend another $995 and get 2x speed and 4x resolution! such crippleware is begging to be hacked. Also cant' tell how their $995 CAD offering (NURBS and other 3d goodness) stacks up against the internal performance of other 3d packages. Anyhoo... One reason I like this is that I've always loved film special effects, but have been disappointed by the recent trend towards CG-everything. I personally do not enjoy 3d modeling at all. But with this, we might see a resurgence of the (nearly) lost art of miniature building for film and video and now gaming. In general I think it's way faster to sculpt from real materials and scan the result than to do the same thing in a modeling package for all but the simplest items. For hacker purists, here's a page about going DIY... http://www.chromecow.com/MadScience/3DScanner/3DScan.htm http://www.chromecow.com/MadScience/3DScanner/3DScan.htm

gfodor 17y ago

This has actually been out a while now, pretty awesome tech. I interviewed at NextEngine a few years ago, and they wouldn't tell me what they were working on -- I had to guess based upon their interview questions (about 3d matrix transformations, etc) -- I did manage to come close and guess it was a 3d scanner in box!