>> not the primarily relevant IP doctrine here Judging from a quick read of his other comments I'm thinking that he might be saying that there is another aspect

>> not the primarily relevant IP doctrine here Judging from a quick read of his other comments I'm thinking that he might be saying that there is another aspect of IP law that would cover it. I initially felt the wtf-ness as well. It might be nice for him to elaborate on which would be the relevant doctrine.