5 ms·

This is a pretty embarrassing piece; it reads like something you'd find on a conspiracy forum. 1. Keyboards don't beep. 2. There are lots of more reasonable e

This is a pretty embarrassing piece; it reads like something you'd find on a conspiracy forum. 1. Keyboards don't beep. 2. There are lots of more reasonable explanations for text getting deleted than "state agency wanted to play a juvenile prank on me and be glaringly obvious about it". A stuck key, an intermittent short across some of the leads caused by the coffee he spilled all over his keyboard (conjecture on my part), a glitchy keyboard controller -- we've seen all of these in our shop. 3. In Rio, "a tall American" immediately meets a fellow Westerner and "accosts" him -- by suggesting they go out and see the city? He's a spook because he dressed neatly and was in good shape? Hell, that makes me a spook too. 4. Choose one of the two following explanations for the iPhone behavior: one, a well-funded and resourceful state agency is hiring people to track a journalist writing a book about the biggest intelligence leak in recent history, and the people they're hiring are juvenile enough to use methods straight out of Hollywood to play a prank on their target's iPhone when he sends a text with possibly the most milquetoast insult about their methods in the history of ever; or, two, the iPhone crashed. (Your answer might be used to gauge your sanity.) 5. The hotel safe -- if it weren't for everything else he'd written, I might be willing to buy that this was a botched job. But in the context of the rest of the article, I think the more reasonable explanation is that it was a crappy safe, it never did work correctly, and he only noticed that part way through his stay in the room.

deleted 13y ago
[deleted]
poopsintub 13y ago
Windows beeps when you're pressing keys at the same time or just holding them down. I don't know the exact situations but I remember a "hot keys" notification popping up. Let's consider the article is true and words were being deleted as he wrote them. How ridiculous is that? A. disconnect from the internet. B. The whole manuscript could be deleted with a few keystrokes if wanted. Why would someone sit there and delete out the "bad" parts while they know the writer is actually working and typing in the document? This makes absolutely no sense. PR stunt imo.
- Robelius 13y ago
  The Windows beep is usually from a speaker connected to your motherboard. There is no speaker located on the majority of keyboards, meaning no beeps. It's not ridiculous to think words would begin to get deleted, but it is ridiculous to say some government organization would sit there and watch him type to remove some content. Why would any organization spying on him make it so obvious, and pointless. If he wanted to hide it from them he would just go to another computer. I run into this self'deleting in words once a month. I have no idea how I activate it, but when i type it deletes what's in front of it. It's a frustrating feature that I haven't defeated, but I don't think the government is watching my computer, seeing what I type on Hacker News.
  - _mhr_ 13y ago
    Pretty sure that's the Insert key that turns on "overtype".
  - thaumaturgy 13y ago
    (I have no idea what your technical expertise is like; please don't take offense to this.) Have you noticed whether the blinking cursor has changed from a vertical line to a block? If it has (or, maybe, even if it hasn't, depending on OS + other factors), it's possible you've accidentally hit the "Insert" key on your keyboard, which toggles whether text is inserted or overwrites other text. It's an ancient feature that very few people consciously use any more and still results in the occasional call in to our shop from a bewildered client. Hitting the "Insert" key again should fix the problem next time.
  - fnordfnordfnord 13y ago
    I'm pretty sure the government is watching your computer (internet traffic, and maybe your webcam). They probably don't have you targeted for surveillance by an agent, which is what I think you meant.
    - ChrisAntaki 13y ago
      We haven't yet been marketed a reason to constantly steam our webcams to the cloud. For this reason remote activation would be required in many cases, and that would be expensive on a mass scale. Steps toward cloud services like this might include the Kinect, or face recognition login services. We'll see how it plays out. :^)
ChuckMcM 13y ago
My keyboard beeps, and because it has cherry mechanical switches, I've had the delete key stick. But what is most common is when I'm using a virtual machine and for what ever reason focus is switches momentarily to the VM and then back out again and the VM saw the key up event but the host OS only saw the key down. And I get a zillion characters. Or more likely everything things 'alt' is down or and arrow key. I have to manually go push the keys to re-sync the host OS to the state of the keyboard. That is really annoying!
lukifer 13y ago
One the hand, the "self-deletion" seems very fishy, coming from a layperson's assumptions about computers and hacking, so I lean towards innocuous explanations, if not utter bullshit. But to play devil's advocate, I wouldn't rule out the possibility of a gaslighting-style psychological attack. If the author was deeply infiltrated with the right malware, the keyboard stunt could done, and would achieve one of two things: 1. The writer is so unsettled or terrified that he abandons the project ("the chilling effect"). 2. The writer foolishly goes public with the incident, making him look like a liar or a lunatic to the tech crowd, and probably everybody else too. Food for thought. (As I think about it, this is also exactly the sort of prank that a 14-year-old with a malware toolkit would find hilarious.)
fnordfnordfnord 13y ago
>This is a pretty embarrassing piece; it reads like something you'd find on a conspiracy forum. 1. The guy doesn't seem like a computer expert. Don't dismiss his speculation merely because he's unable to explain what he observed as an engineer or programmer would. 2. There are always lots of more reasonable explanations for any suspicious activity than spying. This will be true for almost every case of actual spying that isn't unambiguously discovered. 4. The fact that one possibility is more likely does not disprove the possibility that it was the other. Do you really believe that every gov't agent is above a juvenile prank, or that none are buffoons? Or perhaps it wasn't a gov't agent but some other person. 5. Hotel safes are universally crappy and usually have a default master password that is known to criminals, and spies. I'll assume there are other ways to break into them as well.
- yrochat 13y ago
  Looks like someone deleted number 3.
  - fnordfnordfnord 13y ago
    I prefer to count in powers of two, at least up to five.
- thaumaturgy 13y ago
  His lack of technical expertise is a very good reason to doubt his conclusions. We've consulted on a few local cases of suspected computer sabotage. (Hurray for small-town politics.) In only one did we find actual evidence of wrong-doing; in every single other one, the case was an otherwise reasonable person whose suspicions were being fueled by a knowledge of I.T. based only on what they've seen on TV, in the movies, or read in magazines. What Snowden did was remarkable specifically because it involved a huge pile of evidence. Conspiracy theorists are quick to point to this and say, "see, see, we've been right all along, and we're still right", but they don't understand that being right without any evidence is useless. So articles like this one pollute the discussion that we all get to have thanks to Snowden's and Greenwald's efforts. Articles like this one erode their achievements. This journalist doesn't seem to have consulted even one technical expert; he doesn't seem to have inspected the safe to gather any evidence whatsoever that it was tampered with; he doesn't seem to have taken a picture of a supposed spy who was assigned to take him around a city. In short, this journalist is not in any way contributing to the discussion that we get to have over the state's surveillance capabilities. He's written a book about Snowden. He should know better.
prawn 13y ago
Is it completely out of the question that #3 was simply a gay guy keen on him?

deleted 13y ago

[deleted]

poopsintub 13y ago

Windows beeps when you're pressing keys at the same time or just holding them down. I don't know the exact situations but I remember a "hot keys" notification popping up. Let's consider the article is true and words were being deleted as he wrote them. How ridiculous is that? A. disconnect from the internet. B. The whole manuscript could be deleted with a few keystrokes if wanted. Why would someone sit there and delete out the "bad" parts while they know the writer is actually working and typing in the document? This makes absolutely no sense. PR stunt imo.

Robelius 13y ago
The Windows beep is usually from a speaker connected to your motherboard. There is no speaker located on the majority of keyboards, meaning no beeps. It's not ridiculous to think words would begin to get deleted, but it is ridiculous to say some government organization would sit there and watch him type to remove some content. Why would any organization spying on him make it so obvious, and pointless. If he wanted to hide it from them he would just go to another computer. I run into this self'deleting in words once a month. I have no idea how I activate it, but when i type it deletes what's in front of it. It's a frustrating feature that I haven't defeated, but I don't think the government is watching my computer, seeing what I type on Hacker News.
- _mhr_ 13y ago
  Pretty sure that's the Insert key that turns on "overtype".
- thaumaturgy 13y ago
  (I have no idea what your technical expertise is like; please don't take offense to this.) Have you noticed whether the blinking cursor has changed from a vertical line to a block? If it has (or, maybe, even if it hasn't, depending on OS + other factors), it's possible you've accidentally hit the "Insert" key on your keyboard, which toggles whether text is inserted or overwrites other text. It's an ancient feature that very few people consciously use any more and still results in the occasional call in to our shop from a bewildered client. Hitting the "Insert" key again should fix the problem next time.
- fnordfnordfnord 13y ago
  I'm pretty sure the government is watching your computer (internet traffic, and maybe your webcam). They probably don't have you targeted for surveillance by an agent, which is what I think you meant.
  - ChrisAntaki 13y ago
    We haven't yet been marketed a reason to constantly steam our webcams to the cloud. For this reason remote activation would be required in many cases, and that would be expensive on a mass scale. Steps toward cloud services like this might include the Kinect, or face recognition login services. We'll see how it plays out. :^)

ChuckMcM 13y ago

My keyboard beeps, and because it has cherry mechanical switches, I've had the delete key stick. But what is most common is when I'm using a virtual machine and for what ever reason focus is switches momentarily to the VM and then back out again and the VM saw the key up event but the host OS only saw the key down. And I get a zillion characters. Or more likely everything things 'alt' is down or and arrow key. I have to manually go push the keys to re-sync the host OS to the state of the keyboard. That is really annoying!

lukifer 13y ago

One the hand, the "self-deletion" seems very fishy, coming from a layperson's assumptions about computers and hacking, so I lean towards innocuous explanations, if not utter bullshit. But to play devil's advocate, I wouldn't rule out the possibility of a gaslighting-style psychological attack. If the author was deeply infiltrated with the right malware, the keyboard stunt could done, and would achieve one of two things: 1. The writer is so unsettled or terrified that he abandons the project ("the chilling effect"). 2. The writer foolishly goes public with the incident, making him look like a liar or a lunatic to the tech crowd, and probably everybody else too. Food for thought. (As I think about it, this is also exactly the sort of prank that a 14-year-old with a malware toolkit would find hilarious.)

fnordfnordfnord 13y ago

>This is a pretty embarrassing piece; it reads like something you'd find on a conspiracy forum. 1. The guy doesn't seem like a computer expert. Don't dismiss his speculation merely because he's unable to explain what he observed as an engineer or programmer would. 2. There are always lots of more reasonable explanations for any suspicious activity than spying. This will be true for almost every case of actual spying that isn't unambiguously discovered. 4. The fact that one possibility is more likely does not disprove the possibility that it was the other. Do you really believe that every gov't agent is above a juvenile prank, or that none are buffoons? Or perhaps it wasn't a gov't agent but some other person. 5. Hotel safes are universally crappy and usually have a default master password that is known to criminals, and spies. I'll assume there are other ways to break into them as well.

yrochat 13y ago
Looks like someone deleted number 3.
- fnordfnordfnord 13y ago
  I prefer to count in powers of two, at least up to five.
thaumaturgy 13y ago
His lack of technical expertise is a very good reason to doubt his conclusions. We've consulted on a few local cases of suspected computer sabotage. (Hurray for small-town politics.) In only one did we find actual evidence of wrong-doing; in every single other one, the case was an otherwise reasonable person whose suspicions were being fueled by a knowledge of I.T. based only on what they've seen on TV, in the movies, or read in magazines. What Snowden did was remarkable specifically because it involved a huge pile of evidence. Conspiracy theorists are quick to point to this and say, "see, see, we've been right all along, and we're still right", but they don't understand that being right without any evidence is useless. So articles like this one pollute the discussion that we all get to have thanks to Snowden's and Greenwald's efforts. Articles like this one erode their achievements. This journalist doesn't seem to have consulted even one technical expert; he doesn't seem to have inspected the safe to gather any evidence whatsoever that it was tampered with; he doesn't seem to have taken a picture of a supposed spy who was assigned to take him around a city. In short, this journalist is not in any way contributing to the discussion that we get to have over the state's surveillance capabilities. He's written a book about Snowden. He should know better.

prawn 13y ago

Is it completely out of the question that #3 was simply a gay guy keen on him?