This does not follow. Private property is private but you can still commit crimes on private property. This logic would permit egregious abuse to go on unchall

This does not follow. Private property is private but you can still commit crimes on private property. This logic would permit egregious abuse to go on unchallenged behind closed doors because its private property. This cannot honestly be what you are saying? There is a balance between the laws that might be broken in order to discover a crime. If someone commits a crime with the intention to discover another crime, you seem to feel it is acceptable to ignore the second crime? It's actually not okay to create precedent that penalizes people that discover your crime, it only makes crimes easier to hide.