4 ms·
it is possible to disagree with apple's investment in "sustainability" and not be a climate change denier
by ueqirat 13y ago
it is possible to disagree with apple's investment in "sustainability" and not be a climate change denier
- thesimpsons1022 13y agoNo one said it wasn't. But this conservative advocacy group did both.
- jpgvm 13y agoMaybe, but a bullshit loaded question is a bullshit loaded question - no matter wether or not you deny climate change.
- protomyth 13y agoProbably not since it is such an effective dismissal. This isn't really about Apple, it is more about the Retail Industry Leaders Association (RILA) of which Apple is a member and the NCPPR going after them. NCPPR isn't some new organization, so they have a lot of things on their agenda (consider nuclear missiles were once an item on it). Not saying their right or wrong on this one, mostly just saying Ars Technica did its usual crappy job on anything with a political bent. They don't seem to do much research into the who or even try to interview anyone.
- flgb 13y agoYes, but a lot of people who like to put the word sustainability in scare quotes are against action on climate change. And a lot of people who preface mentions of the phrase climate change with "so called" are deniers.