3 ms·
would it be something like this: if "setup by the NSA" then "goto fail" I can think of a q that disproves p then! not goto fail. problem is goto fail
by GhotiFish 13y ago
would it be something like this:
if "setup by the NSA" then "goto fail"
I can think of a q that disproves p then!
not goto fail.
problem is
goto fail.
since q is true, p is either false or true, with no distinction either way. So... impossible to prove.
- jakobe 13y agoNope. P is "the nsa is responsible for goto fail". A possible q could be "someone from nsa communicated with someone from apple" Another possible q could be "goto fail was introduced on purpose" These specific qs might be difficult/impossible to disprove, but that doesn't mean that there is no q we can disprove.