Does anyone else see the irony in a politician saying “If you have two different agencies, it becomes a bureaucracy,” Mr. Rogers added. “I think that would be a

Does anyone else see the irony in a politician saying “If you have two different agencies, it becomes a bureaucracy,” Mr. Rogers added. “I think that would be a mistake.”? I think he needs to understand a few things from the constituent's perspective: 1) The government is already too much of a bureaucracy. 2) The NSA is also a bureaucracy ... and doesn't have enough oversight/transparency as it is. 3) He's not really in a position to say what's right since he's part of the problem.