"but c# advocates in microsoft have been quite parasitic in their behavior of pushing the language(inside of microsoft)" How could you possibly have decided th

"but c# advocates in microsoft have been quite parasitic in their behavior of pushing the language(inside of microsoft)" How could you possibly have decided that "parasitic" was the best word? Is C# hanging off the back of F#'s success? Not really. .NET has succeeded to the degree it has because C# is a credible, robust, general purpose, accessible but powerful language. This whole submission is a desperate, misled, confused attempt at elitism, and becomes particularly ridiculous when it's talking about what are trivial syntactical sugar changes. Particularly bizarre is this confused notion that F# is being ripped off, as if there aren't many languages with most of the same rudiments.