3 ms·
> only the JavaScript one is also deliberately sabotaged in order to really stand out as an abomination. I hope this is the case, otherwise someone somewhere t
by IanCal 13y ago
> only the JavaScript one is also deliberately sabotaged in order to really stand out as an abomination.
I hope this is the case, otherwise someone somewhere thought this was the best JS code to solve the problem:
for (i = _i = _ref = this.length - 1; _ref <= 1 ? _i <= 1 : _i >= 1; i = _ref <= 1 ? ++_i : --_i) {
- pselbert 13y agoI would guess this is JS transpiled from CoffeeScript or something similar. That makes it an even less fair comparison, as ClojureScript would compile down to something just as wacky looking.