3 ms·
I don't think "government" means "good engineering", I think that it should be thoroughly vetted by sufficient expertise. I'm not sure if the FDA or FAA are ca
by just2n 13y ago
I don't think "government" means "good engineering", I think that it should be thoroughly vetted by sufficient expertise.
I'm not sure if the FDA or FAA are capable of doing that, given how the government is really, really bad at building or contracting software (in general).
If only we could have some kind of standardized software to power these devices that is built by the community at large and thoroughly reviewed for correctness. Even at the cost of limiting hardware, I think that's an option.
- awor 13y agoIt'd be neat if they could come to some sort of a standard on this so that its an open, reviewable piece of software that handles the crypto side of things and then passes that off and they (the Automakers) can "customize" the rest of the software all they want. Somewhat (but also not at all) like a more advanced ODBII[0] [0]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/On-board_diagnostics#OBD-II http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/On-board_diagnostics#OBD-II