27 ms·
There is no doubt that many claims made by chiropractors are bunk. Many chiropractic practitioners are a little "out there" in my experience. That said, I thi
by tom_b 17y ago
There is no doubt that many claims made by chiropractors are bunk. Many chiropractic practitioners are a little "out there" in my experience.
That said, I think it is a mistake to entirely dismiss chiropractic care as not providing real benefits.
I worked with a chiropractor who was also a trained physical therapist (with many years of PT experience) and the combination of the two practices was key in resolving long-term plantar fascia problems I suffered from. Weird, but the combination of good physical therapy with actual adjustment of my problematic foot bone structure solved a chronic issue after orthopedic physicians had told me to basically give up or consider a surgical solution.
So while chiropractic care is over-promoted and over-blown by many, it can be helpful as an adjunct mode of care. Whenever people ask, I always point out that the chiropractor I worked with was also a physical therapist and that I think the physical therapy side of the treatment was more helpful than the chiropractic, but that I found both treatments helpful.
- jerf 17y agoThere are really two chiropractices, from what I can see. There is a limited, scientific chiropractice that limits itself to physical injuries, and while its domain is not zero, it's so limited I sometimes wonder at if it's really enough to be its own specialty. Maybe it is, it just seems thin to me compared to a full physical therapy regime. Then there's the total quack chiropractice that gets covered by things like http://www.chirobase.org/ http://www.chirobase.org/ . (I observe that they call the first type of chiropractor a "straight" chiropractor.) It is a pity they have the same name, as if Astronomy was still called Astrology. It really messes up debates over chiropractics.