So this is a tiny bit of a pet peeve of mine: I do not think changing strictly more informative titles to the version in the article itself is a good idea. Cha

So this is a tiny bit of a pet peeve of mine: I do not think changing strictly more informative titles to the version in the article itself is a good idea. Changing "Brian Armstrong: What's Not Being Said About Bitcoin" to "What's Not Being Said About Bitcoin" helps nobody. "Brian Armstrong" is not editorializing. It's a fact. Proposal: Instead, put the non-canonical part in brackets at the end, like so: What's Not Being Said Aboit Bitcoin [Brian Armstrong] Editorializing additions would still be banned.