2 ms·
Oh ... I completely missed that interpretation (maybe I'm too close to these techniques). In any case, it's probably better to think of the system as a giant s
by smoyer 13y ago
Oh ... I completely missed that interpretation (maybe I'm too close to these techniques). In any case, it's probably better to think of the system as a giant state machine in which the data are states and the operations are transitions. Its processing and memory co-mingled. You'll notice that it's got a very wide data width (not a new idea) that speeds it up tremendously for parallizeable tasks, but it's actually slowing down the "clock" since the memory itself is still the slowest part.
(I also upvoted you ... you shouldn't get penalized for an honest question)
- dclara 13y agoUpvoted you. We need more insights like this than the document itself. The concept of state machine, PIM (processing in memory) and parallelization is the core, looks like Micro has some implementation now. That's why they call it an Automata Processor (AP).