Yet, upon second reading, I think the intention was probably more to cast Bitcoin as a wild-west, do-at-your-own-risk, good-luck-to-ya type of asset to work wit

Yet, upon second reading, I think the intention was probably more to cast Bitcoin as a wild-west, do-at-your-own-risk, good-luck-to-ya type of asset to work with. I think the message was meant more for banks and investors. Isn't that also the thing the libertarian reader is looking for?