5 ms·

Since the two main comments in this thread are unnecessary negative, I will point out the ongoing discussion in /r/cpp: http://www.reddit.com/r/cpp/comments/1z

by dmunoz 13y ago

Since the two main comments in this thread are unnecessary negative, I will point out the ongoing discussion in /r/cpp: http://www.reddit.com/r/cpp/comments/1z1b1q/c17_i_see_a_monad_in_your_future/ http://www.reddit.com/r/cpp/comments/1z1b1q/c17_i_see_a_mona... The author of the post is also participating there.

dmm 13y ago
Everyone in the c-preprocessor subreddit is surprisingly open minded about new c++ features.
- pbsd 13y ago
  I honestly don't understand the outrage here. This is about standard library functionality, not new language features. As far as standard libraries go, C++'s is actually pretty small and could use some additions.
  - agwa 13y ago
    (I presume) dmm is cracking a joke about how he thinks "cpp" should mean "C preprocessor" and not C++.
    - cpeterso 13y ago
      Thanks for the explanation. My mind had been blown for a couple seconds. :)
Suro 13y ago
It's sad to see so much trolling on this language but I suppose we all had to maintain old C++ programs that became spagetti codes and dependancy hells. I'm currently working on a new project using C++11/14 and it's a pleasure to see more functional features that will allow to be more concise.