4 ms·
Simply by having a parser library - and I should mention one meant primarily for natural language parsing - is not indicative of Java being "better" for text pr
by webkike 13y ago
Simply by having a parser library - and I should mention one meant primarily for natural language parsing - is not indicative of Java being "better" for text processing than lisp. Indeed, one could argue that the mere fact that Java has a library for text processing at all is indicative of lisp being better; after all, the reason lisp does not have an external package could be because it simply does not need one to be just as powerful.