4 ms·
The analogy is pointing out that homosexuality is not a taboo because it's been exploited, it's being exploited because it's a taboo. Your original statement s
by adbachman 13y ago
The analogy is pointing out that homosexuality is not a taboo because it's been exploited, it's being exploited because it's a taboo.
Your original statement seemed to suggest that it is still a taboo because those who wish to exploit it want it that way. The cause is not power brokers, it's everyone (or enough of everyone) who makes taboos' shamefulness persist.
- samstave 13y agoI took issue with comparing psychological/social warfare to physical bullets... I felt that while both can be weapons, there is a concrete, perhaps subtle difference between the two.
- TheSpiceIsLife 13y agoAs subtle as concrete