>Regardless if you're life is in danger that's the equivalent of slavery and their not your family anymore their your masters. Yes, women were historic (in man

>Regardless if you're life is in danger that's the equivalent of slavery and their not your family anymore their your masters. Yes, women were historic (in many places) and currently (in some places) property of men. Why don't you get this? You even see history of it in the current western marriage ceremony. A father "gives away" her daughter at the alter. This horrible "tradition" represents the exchange of property from father to husband. Anyways, marriage for love is a recent invention. Previously in time marriage was more of a business transaction.