3 ms·
Potentially GCHQ could be sat on one of the largest private collections of indecent images of people underage. The age range is liable to be 14-50, the article
by nicholassmith 13y ago
Potentially GCHQ could be sat on one of the largest private collections of indecent images of people underage. The age range is liable to be 14-50, the article says around 7% were of people doing naughty things on camera, even if that tails off at the age extremes that's still a worrying thought.
Keeping a creepy eye on your junk, just in case you're a terrorist.
- tomelders 13y agoI'll email the met and tip them off right now. Lets see how evenly we enforce the law in this country.
- nicholassmith 13y agoIf it's anything other than no reply/boilerplate I'd be incredibly surprised, one rule for us, another for the security services.
- SideburnsOfDoom 13y ago> GCHQ could be sat on one of the largest private collections of indecent images of people underage Most likely yes. It has been pointed out that under the UK's tough anti-child-porn laws, there is no way that this is legal. Edit: more details on that from Mr. CStross: http://www.antipope.org/charlie/blog-static/2014/02/rule-34-meet-kafka.html http://www.antipope.org/charlie/blog-static/2014/02/rule-34-...