4 ms·
Re-reading this after a few years was interesting. At the time it really seemed like the Emacs ecosystem is stagnating but this has changed during the last two
by pmr_ 13y ago
Re-reading this after a few years was interesting. At the time it really seemed like the Emacs ecosystem is stagnating but this has changed during the last two years: package managers, crazy good, well maintained extensions (magit, org-mode, flycheck, Gnus), and small language changes. We even had an Emacs-only conference! ;)
Still, elisp is elisp is elisp and there is no getting around that fact. The last Common Lisp rewrite/transformation has, AFAIK, stalled. 'cl is still not welcome in core packages. Just staying with the language and dealing with its quirks has proven very effective and I think this is in a large part due the flexibility of being a Lisp. It might be the wrong language for text-processing, but is the right language for ancient software that tries to stay recent.
- rcthompson 13y agoI agree, the "emacs problem" is more or less solved by the advent of ELPA, along with external package repositories that mean you don't have get your code into emacs to get it widely disseminated. Emacs Lisp is still Emacs Lisp, but it has closures now, so who cares?