3 ms·
Essentially it's proprietary, but with a viewable source. Similar to Microsoft's "shared source" licensing models. Still proprietary at the end of the day. Le
by vezzy-fnord 13y ago
Essentially it's proprietary, but with a viewable source.
Similar to Microsoft's "shared source" licensing models.
Still proprietary at the end of the day. Let's not dilute this with misleading euphemisms like "closed source" and "open source". Freedom is no priority here, it seems.
- captn3m0 13y agoWhat exactly will users be paying for, if you can just clone it and build it?