4 ms·
(Texas Appeals Court) Rules (((Phone Search) After Arrest) Violates (4th Amendment))
by Mindless2112 13y ago
(Texas Appeals Court) Rules (((Phone Search) After Arrest) Violates (4th Amendment))
- MattHeard 13y agoMy brain quickly went through the following process: (Texas) Appeals (Court Rules Phone...) nope. (Texas Appeals) Court (Rules Phone...) nope. (Texas Appeals Court) Rules (Phone Search...) yes. Most of the words can not only both be verbs and nouns, but many appear to conjugate correctly as verbs when the preceding word is interpreted as a noun: "Texas Appeals", "Appeals Court", "Court Rules", "Rules Phone"* *"Rules Phone" doesn't make as much sense, as rules are typically unable to phone anything, including searches.
- joeframbach 13y agoThis was exactly my parse tree as well.
- arh68 13y agoI had different trouble. .. (Appeals Court) Rules (Phone Search) After (Arrest Violates 4th Amendment) --nonsense "phone search after arrest" is terribly confusing, though "post-arrest phone search" is clunky. "Appeals Court" is probably the strongest 2-gram in the headline: https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=texas+appeals%2Cappeals+court%2Ccourt+rules%2Carrest+violates%2C4th+amendment&case_insensitive=on&year_start=1800&year_end=2000&corpus=15&smoothing=3 https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=texas+appeals%...