2 ms·
Neither you nor OP are wrong. It's possible, and common, to have practical tools that suck hard. It's also true that the more people use a tool (and for longer
by ithkuil 13y ago
Neither you nor OP are wrong.
It's possible, and common, to have practical tools that suck hard.
It's also true that the more people use a tool (and for longer time), the more ways it will be found to suck (and Lisp has been around for quite a while (and used by quite a few people too (probably used by less people than Java) and (indeed) it managed to spawn quite a few heated reactions (to it's salient characteristics)))