To be honest, I thought these logos were if quite variable quality. Some of the logos were just fine. Some were quite good. Others were really bad. Some of th

To be honest, I thought these logos were if quite variable quality. Some of the logos were just fine. Some were quite good. Others were really bad. Some of the logos were unreadable, sent derisive messages about the work, etc. The bazaar logo of a sign meaning "Caution, merge traffic" is a good example of one that could be seen as light-heartedly (but probably poorly) poking fun at oneself. Others were just non-functional (clisp). But for the bad ones there were good ones too. Logos don't have to be perfect to be effective. The Ghostscript logo struck me as actually pretty effective. It might not be pretty, but it is quirky, meaningful, and readily identifiable. So I certainly wouldn't put these as a set down as the world's worst logos. There are some bad ones there, to be sure. But there are also some good ones.