4 ms·
I think most would consider that at best a distraction. More often then not overly flashy websites seem to look bad on my book. To me it seems more like they a
by asdfaoeu 13y ago
I think most would consider that at best a distraction.
More often then not overly flashy websites seem to look bad on my book. To me it seems more like they are trying to slip something under the rug while simple designs come across as more focused. Like http://prgmr.com http://prgmr.com http://tarsnap.com http://tarsnap.com and http://nearlyfreespeech.net http://nearlyfreespeech.net .
- dysoco 13y agoI agree, I'd rather have a website like http://www.slackware.com/ http://www.slackware.com/ than any of that bootstrap stuff.
- aestra 13y agoIt is worth noting that the Slackware homepage hasn't changed much in almost 15 years. The only changed they seemed to have made is changing it from a white text on back background design to a black text on white background design very early on. https://web.archive.org/web/19991117022152/http://slackware.com/ https://web.archive.org/web/19991117022152/http://slackware....
- sbuk 13y agoWhy? The "bootstrap" stuff utilises modern, standards based semantic markup. The linked site is poor both aesthetically and technically.